FULŪL AND REVOLUTIONARIES: NEGOTIATING SOCIAL BOUNDARIES IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE EGYPTIAN ARAB SPRING

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  О. Bogomolov

Abstract

This is the 3rd article in a tripartite series on the construction of social and political other in the discourse of the Arab Spring in Egypt. The article discusses the functional aspects of the concept of FULŪL, focusing on its role in negotiating the new social boundaries between REVOLUTIONARIES and their opponents. These boundaries are being established through actions directed against FULŪL (exclusion, marginalization, moral diminishing), the messages that REVOLUTIONARIES address to FULŪL, and their counteractions, particularly argumentative strategies that FULŪL apply for self-justification or undermining the logic of their opponents. The article summarizes key findings of the series regarding the significance of this new concept of the Egyptian political discourse for understanding the Egyptian Arab Spring as a sociopolitical phenomenon.

How to Cite

BogomolovО. (2014). FULŪL AND REVOLUTIONARIES: NEGOTIATING SOCIAL BOUNDARIES IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE EGYPTIAN ARAB SPRING. The Oriental Studies, (65-66), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.15407/skhodoznavstvo2014.65-66.015
Article views: 35 | PDF Downloads: 36

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

discourse, Egyptian Arab Spring, FULŪL, Negotiating social boundaries, REVOLUTIONARIES

References

Bogomolov A. Know your enemy: the concept of FULŪL in the discourse of the Egyptian revolution // Східний світ. 2014. № 3. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2014.03.094

Talmy L. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition // Cognitive Science. 1968. No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2

REFERENCES

Bogomolov A. (2014), “Know your enemy: the concept of FULŪL in the discourse of the Egyptian revolution”, in Shìdnij svìt, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2014.03.094

Talmy L. (1968), “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition”, in Cognitive Science, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2